re https://twitter.com/dubya911/status/988159389990313984
> Pretty sure I didn’t though
I wrote that English, German and Scandinavians are closely related culturally, socially, religiously, and ethnically–that doesn’t make them the „same ethnicity“, neither in my words or reality. As for the still existing differences I’m pretty sure that I’m better informed than you’ll ever be–as it seems that goes for English semantics, too.
> can’t seem to give an example of a
> low diversity yet prosperous nation.
Nonsense, we both mentioned Japan already, they’re 98.5% Japanese according to official stats. Iceland and Finland are still around 94% mono-ethnic, what little non-Scandinavian diversity they have came in the last decades only–you could find that on your own given serious intent! Almost the same for Norway, Denmark, Switzerland, (Germans, French, and Italians sitting in their own Cantons, mostly not bothering to learn each other’s languages). For the last time–all of this goes for most Western nations, too–what non-European diversity they have came post-war, mostly after the 70ies.
30% of German Turks didn’t finish school, 48% are unemployed, (75% and 50% of Berlin’s Turks respectively) 54% of students with migrant background perform badly at school. Almost the same or even worse in all EU countries with Muslim immigrants, whether Turks, Kurds, Arabs, Pakistani, or Bangladeshi. Pretty much the same for the 197 million Muslims of India, btw, though they have been living there for centuries, many being the descendants of the former rulers. You’d be hard pressed to make the case that we own our prosperity to Muslim or any non-European immigration, ever, unless you go back to prehistory. Arguably, Overseas Anglos profited from Chinese immigration, but they are no fools and shun Muslim-crazed EU, they’re not thrilled by the few they have themselves.
I’ll block you if you
a) misreprersent my words
b) say something dumb
ever again.